Estetico – Dr. Marius Popescu
Under our open methodology this clinic scores 52.9/100 on structural verification: physician certification, licences, facility and legal-entity traceability, identifier disclosure and advertising honesty.
Rank #16 of 18 ranked clinics · last checked 17 September 2026
No crown: crowns require register-verified gates, never a clinic's own claim.
Summary
Plastic-surgery practice of a single named surgeon, operating out of a private Bucharest surgical facility. No legal entity or licence identifiers are published on the site.
Axis by axis
rubric value 1–5 · ? could not verify (no points, not a negative finding) · — not applicable: this country has no register of that class · OFF official register · SEC secondary source
| Axis | Finding (rubric anchor) | Value | Source class | Weight | Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | Specialist certification of the responsible physician Could not verify — this register is closed to machine queries in this country, so the axis is left out of the coverage calculation for every clinic on this site. Not a negative finding. Reason: Register closed to machine queries. Last attempt: romedic, 17 September 2026 — secondary source names the physician (former M1 = 2); shown on the profile as a fact — M1 is not scored while the country's specialist register is closed |
? | ? | 26 | 2026-09-17 |
| M2 | Identifiability of the responsible physician Physician(s) named with role and tied to this address. Single named surgeon, tied to the clinic’s surgical facility address, on the clinic’s own site. [site] |
SEC | 16 | 2026-09-01 | |
| M3 | Basic medical licence Could not verify — this register is closed to machine queries in this country, so the axis is left out of the coverage calculation for every clinic on this site. Not a negative finding. Reason: Register closed to machine queries. Last attempt: romedic, 17 September 2026 — The CMR register (the Romanian licence register: membership plus a dated "drept de liberă practică") re-probed on 2026-09-17 still answers, verbatim, HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden {"detail":"Not authenticated"} without a Google-issued reCAPTCHA v3 token. None of the secondary routes publishes a licence datum - ISAPS shows only "Active"/"Associate", ACPR publishes no numbers, ROmedic profiles carry a free-text grade line but no certificate series or number - and the clinic itself publishes no parafă, cod parafă, certificat de membru or autorizație sanitară number on any page reachable from its site. |
? | ? | 8 | 2026-09-17 |
| M4 | Facility registration Not applicable: this country has no Facility register. |
— | — | — | 2026-09-17 |
| M5 | Legal-entity traceability Only a brand, without a legal form and without a responsible person. Whatever we find ourselves is shown on the profile as a fact and does not raise this cell. The site publishes the brand only: no company name, CUI or trade-register number appears on home, /clinica/, /contact/, /termeni-si-conditii/ and /politica-de-confidentialitate/. The ANAF register can only be queried by CUI, so no entity could be tied to this brand. [site] |
SEC | 8 | 2026-09-17 | |
| M6 | Self-disclosure of identifiers No identifiers at all. No CUI, registration number or licence number published on the site. [site] |
SEC | 10 | 2026-09-01 | |
| M7 | Advertising honesty One or two soft superlatives or non-absolute safety promises. Soft superlative in the page description, no issuer: "Descopera excelenta in estetica la clinica noastra din Bucuresti." [site] |
SEC | 12 | 2026-09-01 | |
| M8 | Cross-locale consistency Could not verify — no points, counts against coverage, not a negative finding. Reason: Single language front. Last attempt: clinic_site, 17 September 2026 — one language front; no hreflang alternates or language links The clinic site publishes one language front; nothing to compare. |
? | ? | 5 | 2026-09-17 |
| M9 | Patient documents None. No consent, risk, aftercare, revision or complaint document class found on the site. [site] |
SEC | 5 | 2026-09-01 |
Score ceilings
No ceiling applies. We never apply one on 'not found' alone.
Holds
No hold on this profile.
Inclusion policy
Four mechanical conditions. The first three decide whether a clinic is listed at all; the fourth decides whether it can be scored.
| Identifiable: live public surface + working in-country contact | verified yes [site] |
|---|---|
| Provides the service itself (not an aggregator, booking site or tour packager) | verified yes [site] |
| In scope: the intervention is performed by a physician | verified yes [site] |
| Names a responsible physician | verified yes [site] |
Who is responsible
Named physicians and the legal entity, as published and as matched in the registers. A missing number is a statement about disclosure, not about licensing.
| Physician | Role | Register ID |
|---|---|---|
| Dr. Marius Popescu [site] | Plastic surgeon, owner | not published |
Legal entity: could not verify
Scope and procedure segments
Clinic focus: specialist (no focus adjustment) [site]
Secondary findings (not scored)
What a professional society, an international directory, a hospital page or another jurisdiction’s register says, shown for information where the country’s own register is closed. These facts enter neither the score nor the coverage.
- M1 · Specialist certification of the responsible physician SECA national physician directory lists the responsible physician under the plastic-surgery speciality at this clinic address; the state specialist register (CMR) is not machine-accessible.[romedic]
What we could not verify
- M1 · Specialist certification of the responsible physician — Register closed to machine queries
- M3 · Basic medical licence — Register closed to machine queries
- M8 · Cross-locale consistency — Single language front
These cells score nothing and are not negative findings. A cell on a register that is closed to machine queries is left out of the coverage calculation; the others count against it. Each one names why it is empty; an attempt that did not complete is re-run in the next collection pass. If you can point to a public source, send it.
Contact details
| Website | https://estetico.ro/ |
|---|---|
| Phone | 0040723235577 |
| Address | Str. Ghița Pădureanu, nr. 5, București |
| City | Bucharest |
For identification only; details change — verify with the clinic directly.
Sources
| ID | Source | Class | What it supports | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| site | https://estetico.ro/ | clinic's own site | physician, address, procedure menu, page description | 1 September 2026 |
| romedic | https://www.romedic.ro/medic/popescu-marius-010641 | secondary | GET https://www.romedic.ro/medici.php?q=Marius+Popescu then the profile page - entry "Dr. Popescu Marius", speciality tag "Chirurgie plastică-estetică-reconstructivă", cabinet "Popescu Marius - Cabinet medical de Chirurgie Plastica, str. Ghita Padureanu, nr. 5, Bucuresti" (the clinic address published on estetico.ro). | 17 September 2026 |
Change history
| Date | Change |
|---|---|
| 18 September 2026 | axes.M1: 2 → null (Methodology v1.2 (owner ruling 2026-09-18): M1 is not scored where the country's specialist register is closed; the secondary finding moved to facts[]) |
| 17 September 2026 | axes.M5: null → 2 (Re-run against the ANAF legal-entity register (v1.1 pass 1).) |
| 17 September 2026 | axes.M3: null → null (Re-run against the medical_licence register and its secondary routes (v1.1 pass 1).) |
| 17 September 2026 | axes.M1: null → 2 (Re-run against the specialist_board secondary routes in registry-map (v1.1 pass 1).) |
| 1 September 2026 | Initial collection. |
Correction or right of reply
Corrections are applied with a source link and logged publicly. A clinic statement without a source is published next to the data; the score does not change.
Send a correction about Estetico – Dr. Marius Popescu Email us